Hamlet and Sure Thing | Analysis of Timing and Language

crossroads and accredited social function Analysis of quantify and LanguageGetting it Right An analysis of Timing and Language in crossroads and Sure ThingThis essay researchs how speech is used to reveal the hidden inner thoughts and feelings of characters, and how timing can guide a crucial part in the portrayal of dramatic characters to the audience. The pull in addresses how, in Shakespeargons Hamlet, language portrays the procrastinating working through of Hamlets thoughts, towards his ultimate am sliceion of revenge, and in contrast, how language is crucial in establishing the initial and critical connection between Bill and Betty in David Ives one-Act exploit, Sure Thing. Sure Thing presents a sequence of dialogues between a unripe couple sterilizeting to know one other in a coffee shop. The ringing of a bell interrupts their successive attempts at the selfsame(prenominal) conversation. Signifying time out when one says something unsuccessful, when, in ordinary circumstances, their conversation efficacy have endedBILL. This is my first night out alone in a long time. I feel a little bit at sea, to tell you the truth.BETTY. So you didnt stop to talk because youre a Moonie, or because you have some weird political tie-in -?BILL. Nope. Straight-down-the-ticket Republican. (Bell). Straight-down-the-ticket Democrat. (Bell.) Can I tell you something about politics? (Bell.) I kindred to think of myself as a citizen of the universe. (Bell.) Im unaffiliated.BETTY. Thats a relief. So am I. (Ives, 1994, p.20).In this play, unlike the tumultuous progress of Hamlet, extremes are no good it is the middle ground that both characters seek to inhabit, where unattackable and reliable answers will secure their trust in one other as a potential partner. Ives use of language is witty and selective briefly touching on topics that give the audience an thinking of the character and tastes of the characters, go chopping up the pace to keep their attention . In contrast, Hamlet seeks to explore the extremities of human character and the boundaries between sanity and insanity, and morality and immorality. For example, when Hamlets world is suddenly turned upon its head after the murder of his father, Shakespeare uses allegory to express the ominous and unsettled feelings which Hamlet experiencesI have of lately (but whereof I know not) lost all my mirth, for at rest(p) all custom of exercises and, indeed, it goes so heavily with my disposition that this goodly frame, the earth, come outs to me a sterile promontory this closely excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave overhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appeareth no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapors (Hamlet, II. I. Found in Geddes and Grossett, 2006, P.386).Hamlets vision of the world is compared to a structure the frame of the earth, and the canopy of the sky. The metaphor is extended into the follow ing lines, where the phenomena of the subjective world are ascribed with human characteristics such as brave and majestical. Shakespeares use of landscape as metaphor is crucial here as it emphasizes the turning upside down of Hamlets world the judgment that everything he knew and trusted to remain has suddenly transformed into the worst, most extreme, scenario imaginable.For Shakespeare, it is the gradual unfolding of Hamlets character, which drives the play forward and causes the audience to challenge social and personal values. As critic W. Thomas MacCary comments on Hamlet, the suppuration of the eyepatch is determined by the development of Hamlets character. Furthermore, Hamlet as a character must reveal what is hidden, . so the plot of Hamlet is a gradual revelation of what is rotten in the produce of Denmark. (MacCary, 1998, p.65)The time is out of joint O cursed spite, That ever I was born to set it right (Hamlet, I.v. 188-19. Found in Geddes and Grosset, 2006, p.384 ).Hamlets infamous detain is necessary for him, and the audience, to have the time to assimilate and make an informed head on the events that have passed, before proceeding to the next phase of dramatic garishness. Shakespeare uses soliloquies to portray to the audience what is personal to Hamlet. This technique serves not only to impound the character, thus focusing attention on him, but also encourages comparisons and thoughtfulness on the part of the audience to their own lives, and the country of Denmark. In contrast, the intensity of Ives dialogue between Bill and Betty presents a short, sudden insight into the mental retardation and insouciance of a contemporary young couple, meeting for the first time, while providing a witty and thought-provoking social commentary. As this is a play with few props, the attention is focused on the couple indeed, Bills desire to gain Bettys attention and secure her company is communicate onto the waiter, whose imminent arrival at the en d of the dialogue signifies the closing of the scene. The incident that the waiter never arrives and thus fails to interrupt the course of their conversation isolates the nuisance value and potential irony of contemporary social standards conversation is often jolted, misplaced, and wrongly timedBILL. (Looks around.) Well the waiters here sure seem to be in some different time regulate. I cant seem to locate one anywhere.Waiter (He looks back.) So what do you (He sees that shes gone back to her book.)BETTY. I beg pardon?BILL. Nothing. Sorry. (Bell.)(Ives, 1994, p.17).This inspires the audience to consider the idea that although two fairly similar people are talking in a public meeting place, with nothing to interrupt them, they still cannot get it right. The characters make references to different schedules, missed connections, and the term different time zone is first mentioned by Bill, and then repeated by Betty. This is suggestive of Ives purpose to present to the audienc e the idea that in the 21st century, despite the front end of sophisticated means of communication, the simple act of making oneself known to another remains problematic.To conclude, this essay has shown that timing is crucial in both the plays, not only in the portrayal of the character to the audience, but also in the continuity of each play as a whole. Selective and witty use of language in both plays helps to remind the audience that they are not just watching an imagined scenario, but a bittersweet fraudulence of the society of which they themselves are a part.BibliographyGeddes and Grosset, 2006, The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. New Lanark Geddes and GrossetIves, D.1994, all(a) in the Timing Six One-Act comedies. Dramatists Play Service New YorkJoseph, B., 1953, conscience and the King A study of Hamlet. London Chatto and WindusMacCary, W.T., 1998, Hamlet A organise to the Play. Westport, CT Greenwood Press